Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
RE: fun problem - possibly not possible
From: "Paul Melson" <pmelson () gmail com>
Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:40:04 -0500
-----Original Message----- Subject: Re: [fw-wiz] fun problem - possibly not possible
If I follow the instruction/diagram correctly, the problem here is that
both the sprayer and
the destination host are on the same network, on the same firewall
interface, all configured
with private IPs and public NAT addresses.
What protocol(s) are you using Network Dispatcher for? I'm not sure I understand why 1) Network Dispatcher has to reference the other servers by their public addresses and not their DMZ addresses and 2) why you've got the firewall doing NAT for the servers you're trying to load balance with Network Dispatcher.
The sprayer can't ping the hosts it's listening for by their public IP
addresses, get an
error concerning NATs. Add an alias for those IPs on that DMZ interface,
get an arror about
routes...
If you were doing this with almost anything other than a PIX, this would probably work the way you have it configured. But since a PIX won't route or NAT across the same interface, it doesn't work. That said, I don't think you need it configured that way in order for this to work. PaulM _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () honor icsalabs com http://honor.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 22)
- RE: fun problem - possibly not possible Paul Melson (Mar 26)
- Re: fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 26)
- RE: fun problem - possibly not possible Paul Melson (Mar 26)
- Re: fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 26)
- Re: fun problem - possibly not possible Brian Loe (Mar 26)
- RE: fun problem - possibly not possible Paul Melson (Mar 26)
