Re: ***SPAM*** Re: IPv6 support in firewalls

[Dave Piscitello <dave () corecom com>]

Agree that adds/drops/changes (mergers, acquisitions, divestitures) 
cause huge headaches. Are F1000 companies willing to swap this headache 
for the headache associated with introducing a new NL protocol and 
security product set?

ArkanoiD wrote:
> I think the real reason behind that is not to have those machines in
> "routable space" but just to avoid collisions when you merge big networks
> (ever seen megring two companies both using 10/8? it's just a nightmare ;-)
>  
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 09:30:45AM +0200, Patrick M. Hausen wrote:
> > Yes, I think "official" registered address space for every single
> > node, PC, mobile phone, fridge, coffee machine, ... _is_ the
> > ultimate goal and one of the major reasons to deploy IPv6.

Attachment: dave.vcf
Description:

_______________________________________________
firewall-wizards mailing list
firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards