Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Pix 520 tunnels
From: Farrukh Haroon <farrukhharoon () gmail com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:24:34 +0300
Hello John You need to make sure that the dynamic crypto map entry is higher than the static crypto map(s). Please have a look at the below link: http://supportwiki.cisco.com/ViewWiki/index.php/How_to_configure_Site-to-Site_VPN_client_connection_on_the_same_PIX Regards Farrukh On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Halchishak, John <jhalchishak () ciber com>wrote:
We have two pix (actually three, one failover) 520s that I’m trying to setup multiple tunnels. The two office locations have a tunnel up between them with 2 peer address on the main end and a single on the other. We have need to establish other tunnels at various times to clients. I can’t seem to get a second tunnel up without adding it to the existing named tunnel config as a third peer and even then it tends to flap our tunnel between the offices. Is there some way to accomplish this scenario without causing our tunnel problems? *John Halchishak* *14746 N. 78th Way* *Scottsdale, AZ 85260* *480-624-4927* *480-621-2252 wc* *623-505-8905 pc* * * [image: CIBER - "An Ethic of Excellence"] _______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Pix 520 tunnels Halchishak, John (Jun 23)
- Re: Pix 520 tunnels Farrukh Haroon (Jun 24)
- Re: Pix 520 tunnels Paul Melson (Jun 24)
