
Firewall Wizards mailing list archives
Re: Proxy advantage
From: Kevin Kadow <kkadow () gmail com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2013 10:13:51 -0400
Does this only apply to an explicit proxy server? Does anybody deploy a transparent proxy server and not pass DNS down to the client? Can you call it a "best practice" when it is impossible to maintain in a large diverse network? Aside from applications which are just not proxy aware, even when the application correctly uses OS proxy settings for HTTP/HTTPS/FTP/etc, it may still rely on being able to resolve external names; result is an unmanageably large whitelist for DNS lookups. Same goes with "not advertising a default route" or restricting default route HTTP/HTTPS with ACLs. Great idea, but one which quickly becomes difficult to manage on a large scale network. Once you have any unproxyable applications needing connectivity to Akamai or a similar CDN, these controls are usually abandoned as unmaintainable. Kevin Kadow
_______________________________________________ firewall-wizards mailing list firewall-wizards () listserv icsalabs com https://listserv.icsalabs.com/mailman/listinfo/firewall-wizards
Current thread:
- Proxy advantage Paul D. Robertson (Apr 15)
- Re: Proxy advantage Marcus J. Ranum (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Kevin Kadow (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Marcus J. Ranum (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Paul D. Robertson (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Dave Piscitello (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Kevin Kadow (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Paul Robertson (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Marcus J. Ranum (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage Magosányi Árpád (Apr 16)
- Re: Proxy advantage David Lang (Apr 30)