RE: Symantec Manhunt

["edward gonzales" <egon007 () msn com>]

I wouldn't say illogical.
Decoy server is not a NIDS, it is a honeypot.
Decoy Server (3.1) is the newer version of ManTrap (3.0.x)
HIDS (4.x) is the newer version of ITA (3.x)
Name changes made for the follow on versions.  They don't overlap.
I can't speak for the other products mentioned below.  I've never used them


> IMHO...
>
> Man Hunt positives
> ==================
>  - Hibryd detection: signature analysis + anomaly analysis
>  - Centralized admin, with *correlation* capabilities
>  - Third party event analysis and correlation (Checkpoint, Snort, ISS,
> Tripwire...)
>  - ManHunt: SW-NIDS (unix platform) and HW-NIDS (iForce appliance)
>  - High availibility (HA) support
>  - Reporting capabilities
>
> Man Hunt negatives
> ==================
>  - Licen$e (ok, cheaper than ISS and Enterasys, but...)
>  - Symantec's portfolio is a mess, illogical:
>         * 2x N-IDS: ManHunt, Decoy Server
>         * 2x H-IDS: Intruder Alert, HostIDS
>         * 2x VA: NetRecon, Vulnerability Assessment
>         * Old stuff: NetProwler, ManTrap
>    How will it be reorganized? Will Symantec continue with ManHunt?
>
>
>
> I hope this helps.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

_________________________________________________________________
Don’t worry if your Inbox will max out while you are enjoying the holidays.  
Get MSN Extra Storage!  http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es


---------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------------