IDS mailing list archives
Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article
From: "Srinivasa Rao Addepalli" <srao () intotoinc com>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2003 20:32:31 -0700
One of the primary goals of IDSes (inline or otherwise) is to detect the intention of intrusions. Yes, it is true that Firewall with application intelligence protect the servers and infrastructure and they are needed as part of comprehensive security solution. I understand from the report that, more resources in IS department are required to analyze the attacks. It is also true that today IDSes generate too many logs which turn out to be either false positives OR logs that are not applicable for that environment. Unless these problems are fixed, IDSes will demise over the time. IDS technology is greatly improved in recent times with more and more IDS products coming out with application intelligence. These reduce the false positives. But, other problem that need to be fixed is specific to the deployment environment. IDSes should be flexible to be tunable by the users such as deletion of un-wanted signature rules, modification of signature rules, setting up typical characteristics of traffic etc.. This might sound like need for IT resources, but in the effort it takes to analyze unwanted logs is significantly higher. Thank you for your time. Srini Intoto Inc. Enabling Security Infrastructure 3160, De La Cruz Blvd #100 Santa Clara, CA 95054 www.intotoinc.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training, July 28 - 31 in Las Vegas, the world's premier technical IT security event! 10 tracks, 15 training sessions, 1,800 delegates from 30 nations including all of the top experts, from CSO's to "underground" security specialists. See for yourself what the buzz is about! Early-bird registration ends July 3. This event will sell out. www.blackhat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Ron Gula (Jun 17)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Mike Blomgren (Jun 17)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Stephen Samuel (Jun 18)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article nyec (Jun 17)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Stephen P. Berry (Jun 18)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Reverman, Peter C (Jun 17)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article - BruteForce Security Robert J. Mehler (Jun 17)
- Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Srinivasa Rao Addepalli (Jun 18)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Jim Butterworth (Jun 18)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Michael Sierchio (Jun 18)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article - BruteForce Security Robert J. Mehler (Jun 17)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Srinivasa Rao Addepalli (Jun 18)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Stephen Samuel (Jun 19)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Srinivasa Rao Addepalli (Jun 22)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Jim Butterworth (Jun 19)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Stephen Samuel (Jun 19)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Hall, Andrew (DPRS) (Jun 19)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Paul Benedek (Jun 22)
- Re: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Richard Ginski (Jun 19)
- RE: Recent anti-NIDS Gartner article Mike Blomgren (Jun 17)
