IDS mailing list archives
Re: IDS is dead, etc
From: "Andrew Plato" <aplato () anitian com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2003 16:17:44 -0700
Martin Roesch <roesch () sourcefire com> wrote...
Boiling the Gartner report down, here are my take aways: 1) IDSes produce too many false positives (i.e. the quality of the information they produce is low) 2) IDSes produce too much data (i.e. the quantity of information they produce is high) 3) There is no solution to these problems, therefore IDS is dead and we should all buy in-line IPS, er, "deep content inspection firewalls"!
So, is there any way to make the quality of data coming out of the IDS higher while at the same time diminishing the amount of information generated? We've been talking about this exact topic on this list
since
1999 on and off and I think all the IDS vendors have ideas how to achieve this goal by integrating network maps and host/service identification into the IDS's world view. If those ideas should actually make their way to market, would that make the systems more useful? I believe so. (At this point I usually pitch Sourcefire, but I'll spare you all.)
I think what Gartner's article really demonstrates is that very few organizations are implementing and using their IDSs properly. Gartner's "data" and interpretation are based on the fact that many organizations are not using IDS effectively. As such, they are feeding Gartner with complaints, which Gartner is mis-interpreting as a technical problem. Technically, IDSs are sound. Its not the software or the hardware, it's the wetware. The brains (or lack thereof) that are supposed to be using and administering those IDSs. As a person who implements a lot of IDSs, I've come to realize that very few people really know how to work with IDS (or IPS for that matter). They order up a big expensive IDS solution, plug it in, and then promptly ignore it. When they get hacked or something goes awry, they complain that it doesn't work. Thus, I don't think new features like network maps or host/service data will resolve the problem entirely. It may remedy some of the symptoms, but the disease is that people do not understand IDS and do not use it properly. For this I blame vendors and the high-volume IT resellers. Both of these groups are mis-informing their customers about the REAL costs of IDS. They haggle over features and the color of reports, but fail to inform their customers that in order for their IDS to be effective, they have to actually put a brain behind it. The only answer the IDS vendors can provide is expensive 24/7/365 monitoring, which is not financially possible for many organizations. Moreover, very few organizations develop the procedures and the policies necessary to manage the data an IDS produces. Also, many of the users lack the security training to use IDS information effectively. The result, is a perfectly good technology being misused by uninformed people. The vendors don't want to be too honest about this, because suddenly a $50,000 IDS becomes a $200,000 project. The high-volume resellers don't care about this because their whole game is margin on a massive scale. Educating customers is somebody else's problem. This is where I would sell the benefits of smaller consulting firms and outsourced management and support of and IDS. I would also specifically point out some of the on-site managed security services my company does - but I too will spare everybody the sales pitch. I think if the security community is going to form a response, it must consider that there is still a lot of ignorance and misunderstanding out there about what IDS is, how it works, and what benefits it provides. The Gartner report is merely evidence of how high-up the corporate ladder that misinformation had gotten. ___________________________________ Andrew Plato, CISSP President / Principal Consultant Anitian Enterprise Security www.anitian.com ___________________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attend the Black Hat Briefings & Training, July 28 - 31 in Las Vegas, the world's premier technical IT security event! 10 tracks, 15 training sessions, 1,800 delegates from 30 nations including all of the top experts, from CSO's to "underground" security specialists. See for yourself what the buzz is about! Early-bird registration ends July 3. This event will sell out. www.blackhat.com -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- Re: IDS is dead, etc, (continued)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc Martin Roesch (Jun 22)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc Dragos Ruiu (Jun 23)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc Martin Roesch (Jun 22)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc roy lo (Jun 22)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc broyds (Jun 22)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc belka (Jun 22)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc Martin Roesch (Jun 22)
- RE: IDS is dead, etc Craig H. Rowland (Jun 23)
- RE: IDS is dead, etc Paul Schmehl (Jun 25)
- RE: IDS is dead, etc Craig H. Rowland (Jun 25)
- RE: IDS is dead, etc Ron Gula (Jun 25)
- RE: IDS is dead, etc Craig H. Rowland (Jun 23)
- Re: IDS is dead, etc Andrew Plato (Jun 25)
