IDS mailing list archives
Re: IDS thoughts
From: Mike Frantzen <frantzen () nfr net>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2003 15:33:38 -0400
You're making the assumption that "anomaly detection" means "protocol anomaly detection" (looking for protocol-specific weirdness). The impression I get is that most "protocol anomaly detection" is in fact largely rule-based.
Guilty as charged. "rule-based" has some false connotations but yes.
"Anomaly detection", in the IDS context, means "detecting threats by observing things that deviate from a norm". Many types of anomaly detection systems do not use RFC-style rules as a "norm" to validate against.
I haven't seen any sound theory on dynamically learning the "norm" of a network that learns more than connection/flow patterns. I would dispute the utility of an IDS that couldn't tell me that the CEO's laptop was trojaned while he was futzing around at home and someone set up a store and forward attack that just took over the company IMAP server when he got back into the office. The connection isn't anomolous, the payload was. But Arbor may have found a secret sauce. I donno, haven't signed the NDA. From what I have heard, the pure connection/flow anomaly detection engines were trying to enter the IDS space by partnering with a conventional IDS and correlating alerts with the anomalous flows. Again we see a hybrid approach. Will detect less new or permuted attacks than protocol anomaly detection but will not have the type of false positives endemic to pure protocol anomaly detection. Can you do me a favor and go whack Dug, Aaron, Eric, and Jose on the back of their heads for not going to the Calgary hackathon. Feel free to blame me ;-) .mike frantzen@(nfr.com | cvs.openbsd.org | w4g.org) PGP: CC A4 E2 E8 0C F8 42 F0 BC 26 85 5B 6F 9E ED 28 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- INTRUSION PREVENTION: READY FOR PRIME TIME? IntruShield now offers unprecedented Intrusion IntelligenceTM capabilities - including intrusion identification, relevancy, direction, impact and analysis - enabling a path to prevention. Download the latest white paper "Intrusion Prevention: Myths, Challenges, and Requirements" at: http://www.securityfocus.com/IntruVert-focus-ids2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Current thread:
- IDS thoughts Randy Taylor (May 13)
- Re: IDS thoughts Stephen P. Berry (May 14)
- Re: IDS thoughts Stefano Zanero (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Mike Frantzen (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Thomas H . Ptacek (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Mike Frantzen (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Thomas H . Ptacek (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Ramani Yellapragada (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Lance Spitzner (May 21)
- Re: IDS thoughts Stefano Zanero (May 27)
- Re: IDS thoughts Bill Royds (May 21)
- Re: IDS thoughts Mike Frantzen (May 20)
- Re: IDS thoughts Roger A. Grimes (May 21)
- Re: IDS thoughts Raistlin (May 27)
- Random IDS Thoughts [WAS: Re: IDS thoughts] Greg Shipley (May 29)
- Message not available
- Re: Random IDS Thoughts [WAS: Re: IDS thoughts] SecurIT Informatique Inc. (May 30)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: IDS thoughts Andrew Plato (May 20)
