David Ahmad (securityfocus/symantec) exposed

[full-disclosure () lists netsys com (full-disclosure () lists netsys com)]

Tell me how one would go about proving this. I guess the only
way you can be certain of the statement's validity is if
David himself confirms or denies it. One also faces the same
problem offering "proof" concerning Chris Klaus' malicious
activities in #hack back in the day. But here I go throwing
around "propaganda" again...



> If it is truly well known, then how about some actual proof. Th
> at is all I
> am asking.  I mean, especially on this list, how can anyone tru
> st what
> comes from an anonymous email account with no evidence.
>
> On Sun, 25 Aug 2002 rfp_the_ripper () hushmail com wrote:
>
> > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 13:22:14 -0700
> > From: rfp_the_ripper () hushmail com
> > Reply-To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> > To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] David Ahmad (securityfocus/sym
> antec)
> >     exposed
> >
> >
> > It's a pretty well known fact, inasmuch as Elias Levy of
> > securityfocus = aleph1 (= r00t, which was also a criminal
> > group) and Michael  Schiffman of @stake = route (= r00t,
> > guild -- both criminal groups that any scene savvy person
> > knows committed felonies back in the day).
> >
> >
> >
> > > Is there any real proof of this or is it nothing but a bunch
> of
> > > misinformation directed at the big bad evil corporation?
> > >
> > > Seriously, where is the proof?
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, 25 Aug 2002, Defender Defender wrote:
> > >
> > > > Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2002 16:23:58 +0000
> > > > From: Defender Defender <defender242 () hotmail com>
> > > > Reply-To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> > > > To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> > > > Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] David Ahmad (securityfocus/
> sym
> > > antec)
> > > >     exposed
> > > >
> > > > > I was part of several hacker and cracker groups before en
> ter
> > > ing the
> > > > > white-hat side. So what?
> > > >
> > > > So it depends much on what you do. You could have the beli
> ef
> > > that some
> > > > people are worth being hacked, and some others secure, of 
> cou
> > > rse.
> > > > But if you were moderator of bugtraq, a "full-disclosure" 
> mai
> > > ling list, it
> > > > would obviously just be another proof that all you want is
> mo
> > > re hacked
> > > > boxes, and more work and $$$.
> > > >
> > > > That would be a total lack of integrity.
> > > >
> > > > __________________________________________________________
> ___
> > > ____
> > > > Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.
> > > > http://www.hotmail.com
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.h
> tml
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > >
> > > "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"
> > >
> > > hellNbak () nmrc org
> > > http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak
> > >
> > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.htm
> l
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
> >
>
> -- 
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> "I don't intend to offend, I offend with my intent"
>
> hellNbak () nmrc org
> http://www.nmrc.org/~hellnbak
>
> -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html




Get your free encrypted email at https://www.hushmail.com