Full Disclosure mailing list archives
OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable?
From: full-disclosure () lists netsys com (Peter Bieringer)
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 08:50:31 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
sorry, no announcement, but a (perhaps important) question:
does anyone know whether mod_ssl (used with Apache 1.3) is also
vulnerable. Currently, last version seen on their webpage is 2.8.10
(24 June 2002).
Thank you very much,
Peter
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE9R4i4e1eqe5WPQi0RApSyAJ4hAiu+DzcxjOt8jO94YjH/m9iZjACeI15K
MXISa6uXenrVjQ0ewP042UY=
=UXUr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Peter Bieringer (Jul 30)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Jedi/Sector One (Jul 31)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Helmut Springer (Jul 31)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Thomas Oppel (Jul 31)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Ron DuFresne (Jul 31)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Roman Drahtmueller (Jul 31)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Ron DuFresne (Jul 31)
- OpenSSL problem: is mod_ssl also vulnerable? Jedi/Sector One (Jul 31)
