
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Administrivia
From: ka () khidr net (Ka)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 15:53:54 +0200
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 At Donnerstag, 19. September 2002 22:24 chickenshitter () hushmail com wrote:
It seems certain people has an agenda ruin the full-disclosure list and force everybody back to Symantec's list. I wonder who is behind that movement?
Dear chickenshitter, I don't know who is behind _your_ movement, but be assured, that behind _my_ movements (regarding this list that is) is only me. May I kindly ask you NOT to leave this list? The list wouldn't be that funny without the complaints. Allthough I must say that the complaints to noise ratio is rather high for my feeling, and I have often to skip thru a rather large amount of complaints before getting to a real good advisory, I'm ready to pay that price after todays's important advisories. .o)
Don't bother asking for the spam and fighting to stop, it will not. If a system CAN be abused, it WILL be abused. Unmoderated lists have this inherant flaw.
While moderated lists are not read (or at least not read as the first list of choice). Your posting prooves that you _read_ the list and answered it at about 6:30 am local time. And speaking about usage/abusage - how one uses the list and what one correspondingly defines as abusage is up to the posters and subscribers. I use the list to learn. You don't, you seem to know allready.
All these great minds on this list and you are not able to stop a few pea brains? Let's find a solution that is more solid than asking them to stop. At this point I see filtering on your own client as the only solution.
That's true basic security reasoning - rule #1 - "What you don't do yourself, is not done." But in light of this rule bugtraq is not a list for true security but rather a list for the security industry and their clients - - or in my words luser-support-industry and lusers.
I want the REAL GOBBLES back! He was coo with me
A wonder whose posts will bring him back, yours? rule #2: "Don't expect them to play according to your wishes or rules. Create facts." Ka - -- No exit before you know who you are. No longing for exit afterwards. http://www.khidr.net/users/ka/pgpkey.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE9iyh+72vu22ltWBERApOLAJ4zsCdCsniTFzw5fD2JUDm5rZvGWwCdFFyT 7JukShmIkX2ZJ08jM/HmOhg= =qYYb -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Current thread:
- Administrivia John Cartwright (Sep 11)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Administrivia Len Rose (Sep 19)
- Administrivia memetic-engineer () australia edu (Sep 19)
- Administrivia KF (Sep 19)
- RE: Administrivia chickenshitter () hushmail com (Sep 19)
- another topic, was Re: RE: Administrivia silvio () big net au (Sep 19)
- RE: Administrivia Simon Richter (Sep 20)
- RE: Administrivia Ka (Sep 20)
- RE: Administrivia winterslip () hushmail com (Sep 19)
- ltrace, was Re: RE: Administrivia silvio () big net au (Sep 19)
- RE: Administrivia Steve (Sep 20)
- RE: Administrivia empirical () hushmail com (Sep 19)
- Administrivia Moyer, Shawn (Sep 23)
- Administrivia Charles Stevenson (Sep 23)