
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM
From: martin f krafft <madduck () madduck net>
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 15:22:23 +0200
also sprach Rick Salisko <saliskor () cyberus ca> [2003.08.19.1427 +0200]:
Has anyone seen any Windows NT 4.0 workstations or servers infected by Blaster? I have had patched and unpatched servers sitting on the net for a couple of days and, although both have been hammered by the worm, no infection has been noted on either.
While NT 4.0 is susceptible to the DCOM flaw, the Blaster worm only affects Win2k and XP. -- martin; (greetings from the heart of the sun.) \____ echo mailto: !#^."<*>"|tr "<*> mailto:" net@madduck invalid/expired pgp subkeys? use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver! nobody expects the spanish inquisition. -- monty python
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- NT 4.0 and DCOM Rick Salisko (Aug 19)
- Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM martin f krafft (Aug 19)
- Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM KF (Aug 19)
- Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM Rick Salisko (Aug 19)
- R: NT 4.0 and DCOM edp (Aug 19)
- Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM Stephen (Aug 19)
- Re: Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM Rick Salisko (Aug 20)
- Re: NT 4.0 and DCOM Rick Salisko (Aug 19)