Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before]
From: "Rick Updegrove \(security\)" <security () updegrove net>
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:23:18 -0800
----- Original Message ----- From: "Len Rose" <len () netsys com> To: <full-disclosure () lists netsys com> Sent: Thursday, February 13, 2003 9:48 AM Subject: [Full-disclosure] [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before]
Wow, Symantec is making an amazing claim. They were able to detect the slammer worm "hours" before. Did anyone receive early alerts from Symantec about the SQL slammer worm hours earlier?
The first I heard of SQ_Hell (The first name given it by Geoff Shively of http://www.pivx.com) was dated Jan 25 2003 7:11AM here: http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/308306/2003-01-24/2003-01-30/2 I don't use symantec products so I wouldn't have gotten any notice from them. Someone else will have to verify that their notices went out before Michael Bacarella's post. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before] Len Rose (Feb 13)
- Re: [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before] Rick Updegrove (security) (Feb 13)
- Re: [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before] Michael Scheidell (Feb 13)
- RE: [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before] Jason Coombs (Feb 13)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before] tecky (Feb 13)
- Re: [sean () donelan com: Symantec detected Slammer worm "hours" before] Ron DuFresne (Feb 13)
