Re: DCOM RPC exploit (dcom.c)

[Etaoin Shrdlu <shrdlu () deaddrop org>]

manohar singh wrote:
> Well,
>
> So far about a 100 emails on this subject (dcom.c),
> and  all this is doing is irritate everybody.

Well, normally I'd agree with you (although I wouldn't feel the need to
post about it), but not this time.

> Guys, this IS an unmoderated list, and people WILL
> post exploits. Clear and simple. Let's just grow up,
> and get back to work instead of cribbing in public
> forums.

There've been a lot of moronic statements made in this thread, true enough,
but I've actually learned a couple of things here. It's been mostly
interesting, strange though that may seem, including (I think it was
Nick's) a reference to a site on locking down windows that I hadn't seen
before. I dunno.

It's a lot more interesting that having some fool complain about Mr. XSS
(aka morning wood), and then quote the WHOLE damned post, so that those of
us who have him quietly killfiled still get smacked with his sophomoric
dribblings. I courteously removed the cc list, and I'm sure that those who
were on it are grateful.

Yes, I did indeed steal my new sig right out of Len's mouth. Too funny for
words. Besides, Real Programmers used NOS/BE.

--
Think of the joke sold to millions of people masquerading
as an operating system coded by unemployed vms programmers,
and visual basic "experts" instead.
                Full Disclosure - We believe in it.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html