Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Search Engine XSS
From: Shanphen Dawa <list () hardlined com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 17:35:31 -0500
So why not show one of these legitimate examples instead of the overused window popup script? It would just be easier to ascertain the level of severity if an actual DoS string or this "trusted internal call" was exploited. I am sure there are a lot of forms that can be a victim of a xss string, but how many of them can actually be used for anything useful (from an attacker point of view)? On Wed, 23 Jul 2003 11:34:53 -0700 "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com> wrote:
both..Can you use this to DoS the server?consider that the server must process the requests.. i think it can be a DoS issue with enough length and quanity of the requests.Can you use this to gain access to areas on the server otherwise notavailable? many servers assume a call to "/somefolder/somefile.ext" is a trusted internal call. where http://theserver/somefolder/somefile.ext morning_wood http://exploitlabs.com
-- /* "To avoid all evil, to cultivate good, and to cleanse one's mind this is the teaching of the Buddhas." Martin Ekendahl http://www.hardlined.com martin () hardlined com */ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Search Engine XSS morning_wood (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS Liu Die Yu (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS Shanphen Dawa (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS northern snowfall (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS morning_wood (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS Shanphen Dawa (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS Bill Pennington (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS Sam Baskinger (Jul 23)
- Re: Search Engine XSS Sam Baskinger (Jul 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Search Engine XSS bobby manly (Jul 23)
