Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: impending 0day
From: "adf--at--Code511.com" <adf () code511 com>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 22:26:58 +0200
Please admin rule the list it's getting more and more lam' I don't think the aim of the list is to replace "firewall for dummies" books, or I discovered 0d4y'z it's l33t. Let me know (off list) if I'm wrong , and I'll sign off, but those past 40's mails are getting under the level of the real FD mailing list and really useless. Are those posters are sponsered by sf or top "sec sites" to discredit full disclosure? Save k's, think before posting, deepquest ------------ Look I have 0d4yz: % cp /bin/sh . > % cc -o usr usr.c > % set path=(. $path) > % setenv IFS / > % rdist Mar 7 1994 7:17AM Le 5/06/03 8:54 PM, « morning_wood » <se_cur_ity () hotmail com> a écrit :
Do any of you realize how hard it is to investigate a 0day im realasing today??? ( hell I discovered it 20 minuts ago ) DONT FRET YOUL GET 1 OUT OF THE 3 REAL INFO TODAY http://exploitlabs.com "saving Full Disclosure'a ass from boredom"
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- impending 0day morning_wood (Jun 05)
- RE: impending 0day Ed Carp (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day morning_wood (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day madsaxon (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day morning_wood (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day adf--at--Code511.com (Jun 05)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: impending 0day Ed Carp (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day Anne Carasik (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day eddie (Jun 05)
- Re: impending 0day Alexandru Balan (Jun 07)
- Re: impending 0day Anne Carasik (Jun 05)
- RE: impending 0day Ben Tyson-Norrman (Jun 05)
- RE: impending 0day Ed Carp (Jun 05)
