Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Zone Alarm
From: Shawn McMahon <smcmahon () eiv com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2003 16:20:19 -0400
On Wed, Jun 04, 2003 at 09:23:00PM +0200, Sven Hoexter said:
As always a "firewall" is the whole construct with portfilters and users who know on wich "Install this cool Dialer button" they should klick and on which not. Ah and a system wich receives regular vendor patches is a part of the whole, too.
Although "fails open" is a pretty powerful argument against software firewalls, it's probably easier to get a user to download and install a new copy of Zone Alarm (especially if it has some kind of auto-update feature, which I dunno since I don't use it), than it is to get them to download a new firmware image for their hardware router and flash it. -- Shawn McMahon | Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, EIV Consulting | that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any UNIX and Linux | hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure http://www.eiv.com| the survival and the success of liberty. - JFK
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: AW: Zone Alarm, (continued)
- RE: AW: Zone Alarm JT (Jun 04)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm Ron DuFresne (Jun 05)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm BlueRaven (Jun 13)
- Re: AW: Zone Alarm Michael Reilly (Jun 04)
- Re: Zone Alarm BlueRaven (Jun 13)
- Re: Zone Alarm Dave Howe (Jun 13)
- Re[2]: Zone Alarm 3APA3A (Jun 13)
- Re: Zone Alarm BlueRaven (Jun 16)
- Re: Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 04)
- Re: Zone Alarm Michael Reilly (Jun 04)
- [OFFTOPIC] Zone Alarm Kurt Seifried (Jun 04)
- Re: Zone Alarm Shawn McMahon (Jun 05)
- RE: Zone Alarm JT (Jun 05)
