Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: WinME firewalling
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Sun, 09 Nov 2003 22:14:47 -0500
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 07:43:32 +0530, morning_wood <se_cur_ity () hotmail com> said:
Actualy winMe is quite safe out of the box ( its win9x ) and does not have the remote compromises that affect winXP / win2k
Except that out of the box, it installs IE, and some Outlook variant, and who knows what else that's got horrible holes in it.... Yes, out of the box it's mostly secure against random stray packets that happen to be wandering the net. On the other hand, that's distinct from being "secure" or "safe". Unfortunately, a $50 firewall isn't going to protect against many of the email/web based trojans/viruses. Might try Zone Alarm and tell the granny to panic if something she doesn't know about tries to "phone home" (Probably won't take more than a long afternoon to get it trained which apps are authorized). I hate to say it, but there's no such thing as good, *totally* invisible security. People need to get used to the idea that their computers *do* require ongoing maintenance just like their cars do. Download patches, change the oil, actually pay attention to the alert popups/red dashboard lights, and so on. Yes, trying to make it less obtrusive is a laudable goal, but the user *does* have to take some responsibility here....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- WinME firewalling j (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling Paul Schmehl (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling morning_wood (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling morning_wood (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 09)
- Re: WinME firewalling adam morley (Nov 09)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: WinME firewalling igenge2 (Nov 09)
- RE: WinME firewalling Schmehl, Paul L (Nov 10)
- Linksys MULTICAST sieve (was WinME firewalling) Marc Chabot (.net) (Nov 10)
