Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security
From: Michael Gale <michaelgale () bluesuperman com>
Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2003 16:48:57 -0700
Windows 2003 - HAAHHAHAAH Ok - the company I work for now - hired me and fired the pervious network admin. Why do you ask -- because they where running Win2k with NO problems at all. The previous network admin decided to move everything to Win2k3. Since then the following problems have occured: lost file permissions - directories and files would just loose there security permissions, so no one could access the file at. The admin could not restore the permissions, the only way to fix the issue was to make the admin the owner of the file or dir and then give access rights to the user. inherited permissions would just stop working and reapplying - HAHAHH made no difference. Network logins -- would just stop working, the users passwords would not longer work. Resetting them would sometimes solve the issue. So -- now I get to move everything back to Win2k. Now this really sucks since I usually only do Unix / Linux system administration. Michael. On Sat, 01 Nov 2003 10:48:00 -0600 Paul Schmehl <pauls () utdallas edu> wrote:
--On Friday, October 31, 2003 10:16 PM -0800 "Charles E. Hill" <chill () herber-hill com> wrote:Gates spoke as a politician. His comments were very narrowly tailored. Read them close. He spoke almost exclusively of Win2003 Server -- which has very minimal deployment and is brand new. I don't know anyone who has actually installed Win2k3, yet.Well, now you do. We rolled out Win2k3 AD a month ago. We have a number of Win2k3 servers. Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security, (continued)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Ron DuFresne (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 03)
- RE: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Ron DuFresne (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Gary E. Miller (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Gary E. Miller (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Geoincidents (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Cesar (Oct 31)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Charles E. Hill (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Paul Schmehl (Nov 01)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Michael Gale (Nov 02)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Ron DuFresne (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Gary E. Miller (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Gary E. Miller (Nov 01)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Paul Schmehl (Oct 31)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Ron DuFresne (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Gary E. Miller (Nov 03)
- Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Cael Abal (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Ron DuFresne (Nov 03)
- Re: Re: Gates: 'You don't need perfect code' for good security Gary E. Miller (Nov 03)
