Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Sidewinder G2
From: "Daniel Sichel" <daniels () ponderosatel com>
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 11:54:49 -0800
Thanks for the input I have received on safe configurations for the
Sidewinder G2. After reading all the responses which pretty universally
confirmed my instinct that it would be less than clever to have sendmail
running on a firewall, I began to doubt that I had heard the tech guy
who recommended it correctly. So I checked the manual which recommends
as most secure the following...
"Host the DNS and sendmail servers directly on
your firewall. The
operating system should be better protected
against a wide-range
of exploits."
PlanningGD.PDF
from Secure Computing.
This represents a very different approach than what was suggested here.
Any ideas why? Who is right? BTW, I hope I haven't broken any
intellectual property (the other ugly "IP" in our little world) laws by
reproducing the quote from the manual. If so I apologize and plead
ignorance. It is reporduced here ONLY for educational purposes.
Dan Sichel, Network Engineer
Ponderosa Telephone Company
(559) 868-6367
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Sidewinder G2 Daniel Sichel (Nov 17)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Shawn McMahon (Nov 17)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Michael Gale (Nov 17)
- RE: Sidewinder G2 Paul Niranjan (Nov 18)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Goetz Von Berlichingen (Nov 18)
- My take on the Newly discovered Exchange Flaw Lan Guy (Nov 18)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Michael Gale (Nov 18)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Valdis . Kletnieks (Nov 18)
- Message not available
- Message not available
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Michael Gale (Nov 18)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Michael Gale (Nov 17)
- Re: Sidewinder G2 Shawn McMahon (Nov 17)
