Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re[2]: Proof of concept for Windows Messenger Serviceoverflow
From: "Hanabishi Recca" <recca () mail ru>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 14:24:51 +0400
I put my hands on a Windows XP SP1 to test, max body length is 3880 instead of 3992. Anyway setting this value lower will give you results too. Regards, Recca -----Original Message----- From: Paul Tinsley <pdt () jackhammer org> To: Hanabishi Recca <recca () mail ru> Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2003 19:53:30 -0500 Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Proof of concept for Windows Messenger Serviceoverflow
I compiled the PoC DOS with one small change so that it would accept IP addresses from the command line instead of recompiling per test. I ran the dos several times per OS, here are the results I got (none of the test systems have the KB828035 hotfix applied.) Windows 2000 Advanced Server SP4: System Crash: http://www.jackhammer.org/exploits/ms03-043/ms03-043_2KASsp4_POC_DOS.jpg Windows XP Gold: No effect Windows XP SP1: No effect Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition (default config): No effect Windows 2003 Server Enterprise Edition (Messenger Service turned on): No effect Doesn't look like this one is the silver bullet to catch them all (*phew*) but it does bring us a bit closer to this hole turning ugly.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Proof of concept for Windows Messenger Service overflow Hanabishi Recca (Oct 18)
- Re: Proof of concept for Windows Messenger Service overflow Paul Tinsley (Oct 18)
- Re[2]: Proof of concept for Windows Messenger Serviceoverflow Hanabishi Recca (Oct 19)
- Re: Proof of concept for Windows Messenger Service overflow Paul Tinsley (Oct 18)
