Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: Linux (in)security
From: Kenton Smith <ksmith () chartwelltechnology com>
Date: 22 Oct 2003 11:17:44 -0600
What I find interesting about this is that the survey was done by a company that sells security services. And of course I'm sure the news release was put out by them as well. Why not show in-house IT staff as being just as stupid as any other user. Sales pitch; "You need our services because your administrator was tricked into giving his password in an online survey." On Wed, 2003-10-22 at 08:12, Schmehl, Paul L wrote:
-----Original Message----- From: Peter Busser [mailto:peter () adamantix org] Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 3:10 AM To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com Subject: Linux (in)security (Was: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: No Subject) In general people seem to believe that Linux is either secure or can be made secure by removing packages and unused services. This believe that Linus is already secure makes people uninterested in security. Why improve something that is already sufficient? Besides that, it is more rewarding to write a new window manager providing more and faster flashy eye candy than to fix potential memory allocation problems that noone ever notices. Well, until it becomes a problem that is.Is it any wonder? With thousands of rabid slash dotters cajoling their friends into switching to Linux because "it's secure out of the box" and "it can't be infected like Windows", what would anyone expect? The same idiots that can't keep a Windows box from being owned are now using Linux. And the result is the same. Now, lest you get your hopes up and think it's possible to change the world, read this: http://www.ukauthority.com/articles/story898.asp After reading this, I had a good cry and then took some aspirin. :-( Paul Schmehl (pauls () utdallas edu) Adjunct Information Security Officer The University of Texas at Dallas AVIEN Founding Member http://www.utdallas.edu/~pauls/ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Henning Brauer (Oct 30)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Peter Busser (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Chris Ruvolo (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Peter Busser (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Arjan van de Ven (Oct 23)
- Re: Linux Exec Shield (was: Linux (in)security) Chris Ruvolo (Oct 24)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security I.R. van Dongen (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Robert Brockway (Oct 22)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security madsaxon (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Ron DuFresne (Oct 23)
- Re: RE: Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 23)
