Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Off topic programming thread
From: "Mortis" <m0rtis () adelphia net>
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 02:00:30 -0500
Feel free to skip this message if you already know how to use the internet and you are disinterested in the programming thread that is currently filling your mailbox. Sorry for wasting your time. Can we move this irrelevant programming thread somewhere where it is on-topic? It may be interesting, but it belongs on comp.programming or something. I might be willing to join in, but it doesn't belong here on FD. This list is becoming the random chatter network. It has a purpose, you know. You ought to be ashamed of yourselves. I'm sure it costs thousands of dollars for every post you send. Let's see... How many people are on the list? How much time does it take to read a message? What's their time worth? I have minimum math skills, but I think I can do this one. 1 person * 1 minute * $60/hr/person = $6. OMG, did I do that right? $6000 for every 1000 subscribers. Plus most of the list makes a lot more than that. Especially in business terms where you at least double the salary costs. You guys suck. The internet is a really big place with a lot of different interests. This is why people created separate lists and newsgroups o so long ago. Hello, people! Are you all brand new to the internet? I can't believe that I need to waste all of the serious people's time telling you this. But apparently I do. Again, I think. I would have just responded to the prior posters, but the list seems full of people who want to tell us about anything but vulnerabilities and associated whatnot. I guess it's worth one mass bitch. Please listen this once. Please. Post things where they belong. You will get a better response and it will save the world a lot of time and energy. God help the next f00l who posts their k00l spam for me to look at. You freakin script monkeeys. Go back to antionline. It keeps JP busy so he doesn't post here. Do y'all want to talk about making pottery next? I hear you need to get the kiln real hot. Is this true? Can I do it at home with newspaper logs kind of like home brewing? How about growing corn. Does it take a lot of effort or what? Can I plant popcorn? I'm very curious about these things. Back to your thread:
BRETT: Are you trying to say that the standard library is badly written?
I will say it. Your risk management system is shoddy as well. Not that I'm blaming you. Been there. Done that. Felt the pain. Probably do it again. It's poor quality. Tell the truth. Here's a bonus on the dead man. Find someplace in your risk management system where there is a divide by 2. Change it to a shift right instead and it will fly like the wind. They'll love you (put a comment in there or it will drive people nuts). Please send something to charity for this strenuous brain noodling.
BILL made a funny: find out how many come from Ada
ADA? You must have meant something that people use all the time like DIBOL or LISP. -- Your ever cranky friend, Mortis P.S. I've been around the block long enough to know that several of you will just have to flame me: Please save money and flame me personally. Everyone already knows you hate me. Oh, well. I'll steal your soul in the end. Everyone hates me. I'll flame myself and save you the trouble. P.P.S. Even tho I'm going to flame Lorenzo in a minute, at least he posts on-topic. Wild and wacky, but on-topic. P.P.P.S. I wish people wouldn't tempt Mortis to be naughty. Mortis needs to be behave. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security, (continued)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 26)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bruce Ediger (Oct 26)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Stormwalker (Oct 27)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 27)
- Re: [inbox] Re: RE: Linux (in)security Bruce Ediger (Oct 27)
- Message not available
- Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- Off topic programming thread Mortis (Oct 26)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Bill Weiss (Oct 27)
- Re: Off topic programming thread Chris Smith (Oct 27)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Paul Schmehl (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Bill Royds (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 26)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Brett Hutley (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Chris Eagle (Oct 26)
- RE: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Steve Wray (Oct 27)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Gregory A. Gilliss (Oct 27)
- Re: Coding securely, was Linux (in)security Valdis . Kletnieks (Oct 28)
