Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws
From: Gary Flynn <flynngn () jmu edu>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:05:42 -0400
I would think a better way of determining if a patch is actually installed on a system is by examining the files on the system rather than to depend upon symptoms (scanners) or installation logs (registry entries). If the add/remove software control panel, registry, or msi say the machine is patched but the files aren't there, an installation problem occurred. If the scanners say the machine is not patched but the files are there then either the patch is ineffective in that machine's particular configuration (PATH?) or the scanner is generating a false positive. -- Gary Flynn Security Engineer - Technical Services James Madison University Please R.U.N.S.A.F.E. http://www.jmu.edu/computing/runsafe _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Ferris, Robin (Sep 26)
- Re: RE: Probable new MS DCOM RPC worm for Windo ws Gary Flynn (Sep 26)
