Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly
From: Fabio Gomes de Souza <bugtraq () gs2 com br>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 22:06:59 -0300
Destroying the monopoly also lets the World get rid of (Anti)Virus companies, since they are protected by Microsoft Virus Support(TM).
Viruses are a threat which has been intentionally neglected by Microsoft since the AntiVirus thing became a business. A BIG business. Imagine if Microsoft removed the Virus Support. Billions of dollars would stop being moved from people's pockets to the software giants. Mega companies would simply disappear from the Market. Hundreds of people would be unemployed. Given the facts, Microsoft is simply UNABLE to fix such vulnerabilities.
Vulnerabilities in Microsoft systems can only be fixed before they become a business. This rule has became worst after their antitrust trial.
Virues have never been a threat for Open Source systems, since they (viruses) use vulnerabilities that get fixed by users *regardless* of some company liking or not.
Diversification and Open Source is the solution for most security threats. These guys have done a GREAT WORK! Best regards, Fábio Gomes de Souza CEO GS2 Tecnologia da Informação Ltda Olinda, Brazil Jonathan A. Zdziarski escreveu:
This was released yesterday just incase nobody noticed. http://www.ccianet.org/papers/cyberinsecurity.pdfAmong the authors are Bruce Schnier, Dan Geer, and Charles Pfleeger. Interesting read._______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 25)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Marc Maiffret (Sep 25)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Richard M. Smith (Sep 25)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 25)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly B.K. DeLong (Sep 25)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Richard M. Smith (Sep 25)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Gregory A. Gilliss (Sep 25)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Mike Hoskins (Sep 26)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Marc Maiffret (Sep 26)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Marc Maiffret (Sep 25)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Fabio Gomes de Souza (Sep 26)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Paul Schmehl (Sep 26)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Rick Kingslan (Sep 26)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Bruce Ediger (Sep 26)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Matthew Murphy (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Rodrigo Barbosa (Sep 27)
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Curt Purdy (Sep 28)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Kristian Hermansen (Sep 28)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Gregory A. Gilliss (Sep 29)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Rodrigo Barbosa (Sep 29)
