Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () ghettot org>
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 20:04:58 +0200 (CEST)
On Sun, 28 Sep 2003, Paul Schmehl wrote:
Oh, you might have a firewall that cordons off accounting from the rest of the enterprise, but *inside* accounting, you still have the "soft, chewy" problem. I haven't really seen anything that addresses this problem, and I'm not aware of anyone who is working on solving it.
I'd argue... many vendors (Okena aka Cisco, BlackICE aka ISS, etc)
provide integrated corporation-wide mechanisms for enforcing group
firewalling, access and logging/IDS policies on workstations or groups of
workstations (and, why not, also servers).
Whatever you think about personal firewalls, some of those projects are
getting quite impressive and far from displaying annoying "You are being
attacked by your DNS server" pop-ups. The technology is quite useful for
this purpose, when used correctly.
There are some ridiculously expensive "firewall switches" that are
IP-aware and enable per-port separation and firewalling...
The technology is there. It takes some effort to use it and do it
correctly, of course.
--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2003-09-28 19:58 --
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly, (continued)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Rick Kingslan (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Peter Busser (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Fabio Gomes de Souza (Sep 28)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Chris Stewart (Sep 26)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly *Hobbit* (Sep 27)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Rick Kingslan (Sep 27)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Curt Purdy (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Florian Weimer (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Karl DeBisschop (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Paul Schmehl (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Michal Zalewski (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Florian Weimer (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Frank Knobbe (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Michal Zalewski (Sep 28)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Frank Knobbe (Sep 28)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Rick Kingslan (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Paul Schmehl (Sep 28)
- Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly security () brvenik com (Sep 28)
- Re: Pudent default security Paul Schmehl (Sep 28)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Jay Sulzberger (Sep 28)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Ed Carp (Sep 29)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Jay Sulzberger (Sep 28)
