Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly
From: Michal Zalewski <lcamtuf () coredump cx>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 11:05:12 +0200 (CEST)
On Tue, 30 Sep 2003, Steve Wray wrote:
There is if you don't use a windowing operating system; this is precisely what my team is doing for a very large collection of firewalled boxes, remotely administered and their forewall configurations all maintained and audited by remote control and en masse to boot.
Oh please... We are talking about desktop environments and LAN "blob
networks"... and Windows is on almost every desktop. If you work for a
company that either never used this system, or could easily migrate to
another system that works better for them, consider yourself very lucky.
In such a case, you do have powerful remote control, backup, auditing and
maintenance tools, and it's easy to come up with a solution that suits you
best. On Windows, however, it takes some serious work to do the same, and
it's often cheaper to buy a product that has the same functionality and a
nice GUI.
--
------------------------- bash$ :(){ :|:&};: --
Michal Zalewski * [http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx]
Did you know that clones never use mirrors?
--------------------------- 2003-09-30 10:59 --
http://lcamtuf.coredump.cx/photo/current/
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly, (continued)
- Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly security () brvenik com (Sep 28)
- Re: Pudent default security Paul Schmehl (Sep 28)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Jay Sulzberger (Sep 28)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Ed Carp (Sep 29)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Jay Sulzberger (Sep 28)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Ed Carp (Sep 29)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Jay Sulzberger (Sep 28)
- Re: Re: Pudent default security Shannon Johnston (Sep 29)
- Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Michal Zalewski (Sep 29)
- RE: Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Steve Wray (Sep 30)
- RE: Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Michal Zalewski (Sep 30)
- RE: Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Steve Wray (Sep 30)
- RE: Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly j (Sep 30)
- RE: Re: Pudent default security - Was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Frank Knobbe (Sep 30)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Florian Weimer (Sep 28)
- Soft-Chewy insides (was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly) Curt Purdy (Sep 28)
- Re: Soft-Chewy insides (was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly) George Capehart (Sep 29)
- Re: Soft-Chewy insides (was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly) Michael Scheidell (Sep 29)
- Re: Soft-Chewy insides (was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly) George Capehart (Sep 29)
- Re: Soft-Chewy insides (was: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly) Michael Scheidell (Sep 29)
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Curt Purdy (Sep 28)
