Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly
From: Thomas Binder <full-disclosure () arago de>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:44:38 +0200
Hi! On Tue, Sep 30, 2003 at 04:09:51PM +1000, Chris Cozad wrote:
To actually get users to attend this level of training would be fantastic. Our jobs would be so much easier. But it just aint gunna happen in the real world. It is definitely up to us, as security professionals, to effectively "idiot proof" our systems, so that users only need to know some basic security rules.
Unfortunately, there's always the security/convenience-tradeoff, i.e. it's quite difficult to design a system / software that's both very secure and very convenient at the same time. Not to mention trying to achieve that for existing systems, especially after people already got used to them. Ciao Thomas _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Chris Cozad (Sep 29)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Thomas Binder (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Valdis . Kletnieks (Sep 30)
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Michael Smith (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Ron DuFresne (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Mo nopoly Frank Bridges (Sep 30)
