Full Disclosure mailing list archives
More on Dan Geer
From: Stormwalker <bruen () coldrain net>
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:18:47 -0400 (EDT)
The following quotes clarify @Stake's position. It's worse than even I
thought. They know better, but don't care anymore. M$ is more important
than truth.
"Chris Wysopal, @stake's director of research, said the company had no
argument with the report's basic premise that technological diversity
poses less of a security risk than monolithic architectures. "But the way
the report is positioned and a lot of its conclusions are things we don't
agree with. The report is a bit one-sided," he said."
"An @stake official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, confirmed that
Geer was fired and said that as a corporate officer he should have known
that Microsoft was a client of the company. "It's not a matter of the
content of the report; it's a matter of ethics and respect for clients,"
the official said."
Full story:
http://computerworld.com/securitytopics/security/story/0,10801,85441,00.html
ComputerWorld
@stake fired its CTO for co-authoring the document
Story by Dan Verton
SEPTEMBER 26, 2003
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly, (continued)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 28)
- WINDOWS XP software restriction policy [path rule] bypass... bipin gautam (Sep 28)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Jonathan A. Zdziarski (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Jeremiah Cornelius (Sep 28)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Joe (Sep 27)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Georgi Guninski (Sep 30)
- RE: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Curt Purdy (Sep 30)
- Re: [inbox] Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly morning_wood (Sep 30)
- Re: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Curt Purdy (Sep 30)
- More on Dan Geer Stormwalker (Sep 30)
- Re: More on Dan Geer madsaxon (Sep 30)
- Re: More on Dan Geer Keith W. McCammon (Sep 30)
- Re: More on Dan Geer madsaxon (Sep 30)
- Re: More on Dan Geer Keith W. McCammon (Sep 30)
- Re: More on Dan Geer madsaxon (Sep 30)
- Re: More on Dan Geer Nexus (Sep 30)
- RE: CyberInsecurity: The cost of Monopoly Joe (Sep 27)
