Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers?
From: "morning_wood" <se_cur_ity () hotmail com>
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2003 23:01:28 -0700
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers?
It's not really common practice for transit type providers to do this. The networks are typically engineered to forward packets and not filter them. Hopefully the providers have dedicated staff to handle abuse. In that case issues should be handled on a case-by-case basis.
in my local area comcast is blocking 135 and 445, further I have advised comcast of thinknaw, just dont give it out of blocking inbound 6667 as i feel this would reduce many of the mechanisims using [sd]bot type agents attacking against ircd. since running a IRC server is in contrast to thier ToS. DMCA observances: quote from comcast tv commercial "download your favorite music, and movie trailers online" - - note the use of the phrase "trailers" to note the destinction between them ( legal ) and full movies ( illegal ), but nothing about said music ( of which you can get "trailers" of commercial releases ( legal )) as opposed to commercial releases ( illegal ). Donnie Werner http://e2-labs.com _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? Richard M. Smith (Sep 08)
- Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? nonleft (Sep 08)
- Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? Stephen Perciballi (Sep 08)
- Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? morning_wood (Sep 08)
- Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? Stephen Perciballi (Sep 09)
- Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? Stephen Perciballi (Sep 08)
- Re: Should ISPs be blocking open ports for their customers? nonleft (Sep 08)
