Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft
From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards () hq adiscon com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:17:30 +0200
I can understand you frustration of no linux & crackedgames anymore,but "written permission"... Well, well...You misunderstand me completely beside the fact that you accuse me of creating copies of games. I am the person who cracked the xbox open via the font hack and I am not frustrated at all, because I can revert the illegal changes of MS to MY hardware anytime. It is just that MS has no fucking right to autoupdate my box. No matter if I am a LIVE customer or not. They can terminate my license and pay me my money back if the update is really needed, which it is not.
My apologies in this case, but your post really sounded like being from a different person with some different mind behind him... But - honestly - do you really think Microsoft has designed to box in the way you intend to use it? Didn't you then take it as a challenge to do something with it that it was not really designed for?
As you said "it *finally* happened" ;) If you purchase thatblackboxdesign, you get what you pay for. Microsoft never said it did these things that you try to do. While there are good points toblame them,I think this time it is not. It is simply doing what it wassupposedto...There is NOT a single word in the whole EULA and documentation of the XBOX that it will not execute nonsigned software. I found a way to work around this defect. Microsoft destroyed that way, they killed one of the features (again... nowhere in the docu is written that this is NOT one of the features) So I want my money back. I payed for a black box with specific features the font hack was one of the features. If they kill this feature, they kill my property and have to pay for it.
Honestly, I still can't follow you on this route. I wouldn't purchase the XBOX first place because MS intention with it is well-known. If you repair these "defects" and make it even more succcessful (because of this) in the marketplace - is that really good? Wouldn't it be better to make it an economic failure so that vendors see this is the wrong approach (as the music industry now slowly learns)? Rainer _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft, (continued)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Joseph Ercole (Sep 11)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Azerail (Sep 13)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Jay Sulzberger (Sep 13)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Stefan Esser (Sep 11)
- RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Andy Wood (Sep 11)
- RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Rick Kingslan (Sep 11)
- RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Jay Sulzberger (Sep 11)
- RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Rick Kingslan (Sep 11)
- RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Jay Sulzberger (Sep 11)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Peter van den Heuvel (Sep 11)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft William Warren (Sep 11)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Peter van den Heuvel (Sep 11)
- Re: RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Michael D Schleif (Sep 12)
- Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft Stefan Esser (Sep 11)
- Re: Re: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft J.A. Terranson (Sep 11)
