Full Disclosure mailing list archives

RE: Computer Sabotage by Microsoft


From: "Rainer Gerhards" <rgerhards () hq adiscon com>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 22:17:30 +0200

I can understand you frustration of no linux & cracked 
games anymore, 
but "written permission"... Well, well...

You misunderstand me completely beside the fact that you 
accuse me of creating copies of games. I am the person who 
cracked the xbox open via the font hack and I am not 
frustrated at all, because I can revert the illegal changes 
of MS to MY hardware anytime. It is just that MS has no 
fucking right to autoupdate my box. No matter if I am a LIVE 
customer or not. They can terminate my license and pay me my 
money back if the update is really needed, which it is not.

My apologies in this case, but your post really sounded like being from
a different person with some different mind behind him...

But - honestly - do you really think Microsoft has designed to box in
the way you intend to use it? Didn't you then take it as a challenge to
do something with it that it was not really designed for?

As you said "it *finally* happened" ;) If you purchase that 
blackbox 
design, you get what you pay for. Microsoft never said it did these 
things that you try to do. While there are good points to 
blame them, 
I think this time it is not. It is simply doing what it was 
supposed 
to...

There is NOT a single word in the whole EULA and 
documentation of the XBOX that it will not execute nonsigned 
software. I found a way to work around this defect. Microsoft 
destroyed that way, they killed one of the features (again... 
nowhere in the docu is written that this is NOT one of the 
features) So I want my money back. I payed for a black box 
with specific features the font hack was one of the features. 
If they kill this feature, they kill my property and have to 
pay for it.

Honestly, I still can't follow you on this route. I wouldn't purchase
the XBOX first place because MS intention with it is well-known. If you
repair these "defects" and make it even more succcessful (because of
this) in the marketplace - is that really good? Wouldn't it be better to
make it an economic failure so that vendors see this is the wrong
approach (as the music industry now slowly learns)?

Rainer

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: