
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Verisign abusing .COM/.NET monopoly, BIND releases new
From: Joshua Levitsky <jlevitsk () joshie com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:41:13 -0400
On Sep 17, 2003, at 5:37 AM, jamie rishaw wrote:
Please proviede code / config (explain). On Wed, Sep 17, 2003 at 12:42:19AM -0400, Joshua Levitsky wrote:On Sep 16, 2003, at 11:16 PM, Thor Larholm wrote:Mail administrators who use any non-existant DNSBL to mark email as spam suddenly has all their mails deleted,Actually I figured out how to use it to my advantage. I query "." whichis my own DNS server of course as a ip4r blacklist and if the IP forverisign's site is returned then I give the spam a very high score. Anydomain that doesn't exist would fail this, but any other domain would not return that IP, but rather the proper IP. I'm still pissed at Verisign, but I always try to turn a problem in to an opportunity so now I'm using their greed to block spam.
I use Declude which is a plugin to IPSwitch's IMail product. VERISCAM rhsbl . 64.94.110.11 1 0Above is the config line I am using. Basically "VERISCAM" is the name of my test. It's a "rhsbl" test which is a Right Hand Side test. Your Spam filter software needs to be able to RHS style lookups where it's looking at what is to the right of the @ sign. So jlevitsk () joshie com could come from an AOL mail server, but my RHS test looks at joshie.com rather than the AOL server that handed the mail to your server. The next field is "." which is normally where I put like "orbs.dorkslayers.com" or such... the zone that I'm going to query. By putting a "." in then it is checking my local zone and so the query hits my own DNS. That's just where the query goes. "64.94.110.11" is the result I'm looking for from the server. Various ip4r tests result in like 127.0.0.2 or 127.0.0.3 and different values normally mean different kinds of listings like open relay vs. porn spam ... you get the idea. In this case a 64.94.110.11 would return from my own DNS server for any @bla.com that did not resolve.
This test catches anyone using phoney domains that don't exist. -Josh _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) ww (Aug 31)
- RE: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Steven Fruchter (Aug 31)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Nick FitzGerald (Aug 31)
- RE: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) madsaxon (Aug 31)
- Re: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Jennifer Bradley (Aug 31)
- Re: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Kristian Hermansen (Sep 01)
- Re: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Jarmo Joensuu (Sep 01)
- RE: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Schmehl, Paul L (Sep 01)
- Re: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) morning_wood (Sep 01)
- Re[2]: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) Marc Chabot (.net) (Sep 01)
- Re: DCOM/RPC story (Analogy) morning_wood (Sep 01)