Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FW: Question for DNS pros
From: "Gary E. Miller" <gem () rellim com>
Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 13:37:26 -0700 (PDT)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yo John! On Thu, 5 Aug 2004, John Hall wrote:
Is this true for the servers that are doing the recursive lookups for the clients on your networks?
Yes, for the clients. Much less so for the servers, but failover may also cause the servers to recurse from a distant DNS server.
Seems somewhat risky,
Less risky than depending on the name servers of those we purchase dial-up and co-lo services from. If we had to depend on the tech support from those guys our DNS would be broken all the time. With the DNS under our total control we can monitor it for potential problems and take immediate action if needed. When a customer of ours want a DNS change he wants it now. If he is using our name servers we can flush the NS cache, verify with the customer that he is happy and close the ticket. Much better then trying to explain to him that he must wait 48 hours for the changes to propogate. Another advantage is we can provide DNS services to knock out doubleclick and others. :-) We also get a lot of geographical diversity out of the setup. CA could slip in to the sea and some of our DNS would still be up. I am also seeing a lot of DNS servers only answering for their OWN local nets. So the roving laptop almost has to use our DNS servers since he is never sure which local NS to use.
but it's true that such setups would make RTT less useful. It's one of the problems with making GLSB work well.
Damn right it is. Makes the RTT perverse.
Our experience with several large sites indicates that the majority of client connections are sent to the "best" (as defined by the 3-DNS configuration) data-center, so we conclude that most sites (or at least the ones servicing our customers' clients) do have their local forwarding DNS servers "close" to the clients they serve.
Maybe yes, maybe no, but I know a lot of large sites where RTT to the DNS
server will give bad answers.
RGDS
GARY
- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gary E. Miller Rellim 20340 Empire Blvd, Suite E-3, Bend, OR 97701
gem () rellim com Tel:+1(541)382-8588 Fax: +1(541)382-8676
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBEpqJ8KZibdeR3qURAtm0AJ98c1lGVt65Gngu5IX9xiIdCVvRpwCg1/Nf
4esXBtIfaDMgKjfsln+dzIs=
=Zyhr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros, (continued)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros John Hall (Aug 04)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros John Hall (Aug 04)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Nils Ketelsen (Aug 04)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros John Hall (Aug 05)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Mark (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros John Hall (Aug 04)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Gary E. Miller (Aug 04)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros John Hall (Aug 05)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Gary E. Miller (Aug 05)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Aug 03)
