Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: meta-question about the list


From: Brendan Dolan-Gavitt <mooyix () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:48:40 -0500

On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:41:08 +0200, Maarten <fulldisc () ultratux org> wrote:

Hi list,

I noticed that this list (-software) unlike many others does not add a
"Reply-To: field with the list address there.

Not quite correct--it doesn't *modify* the Reply-to: header or add it
if it's not already present.

This makes replying a wee bit
more error-prone since a lot of MUA's will happily reply to the poster
instead of the list unless you manually cut&paste the right addresses.

Is there a special reason this header isn't used ?

Well, some consider it to be harmful:
http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html

-Brendan

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


Current thread: