Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: meta-question about the list
From: Brendan Dolan-Gavitt <mooyix () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 19:48:40 -0500
On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 00:41:08 +0200, Maarten <fulldisc () ultratux org> wrote:
Hi list, I noticed that this list (-software) unlike many others does not add a "Reply-To: field with the list address there.
Not quite correct--it doesn't *modify* the Reply-to: header or add it if it's not already present.
This makes replying a wee bit more error-prone since a lot of MUA's will happily reply to the poster instead of the list unless you manually cut&paste the right addresses. Is there a special reason this header isn't used ?
Well, some consider it to be harmful: http://www.unicom.com/pw/reply-to-harmful.html -Brendan _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- meta-question about the list Maarten (Aug 14)
- Re: meta-question about the list Brendan Dolan-Gavitt (Aug 14)
- Re: meta-question about the list Maarten (Aug 15)
- Re: meta-question about the list Daniel Veditz (Aug 14)
- Re: meta-question about the list Steve Kudlak (Aug 15)
- Re: meta-question about the list Brendan Dolan-Gavitt (Aug 14)
