Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: FW: Question for DNS pros
From: Ron DuFresne <dufresne () winternet com>
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 11:40:24 -0500 (CDT)
No, it was my hurried reading, I see now with a re-read you mentioned window size. If I understand correctly, the tcp packets are mixed in with the udp requests? Thanks, Ron DuFresne On Tue, 3 Aug 2004, Frank Knobbe wrote:
On Tue, 2004-08-03 at 11:29, Ron DuFresne wrote:I think Frank mentioned the packets being like 2048 in size, and this makes me wonder if it's a tad more then mere recon.No, no, the WINDOW size (of the TCP packets) appears to be fixed to 2048. Total packet size is 64 bytes (40 header, 24 null payload). Sorry if that wasn't clear. Regards, Frank
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity. It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
OK, so you're a Ph.D. Just don't touch anything.
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Ron DuFresne (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Mark (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Paul Schmehl (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros Frank Knobbe (Aug 03)
- Re: FW: Question for DNS pros grutz (Aug 03)
