[Fwd: RE: Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit]

[John <JohnH () secnetops com>]

This message was sent to me off list.

JohnH
> --- Begin Message ---
>
>
> From: "muts" <muts () inter net il>
>
> Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2004 22:42:15 +0200
>
> Re John, 
>
> Then you're obviously not a "Whitehat" :)
>
> BUT, your point is taken, and I will not release any more half baked sploits
> into the wild.
>
> Cheers, 
>
> Muts
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John [mailto:JohnH () secnetops com] 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 9:32 PM
> To: muts
> Subject: RE: [Full-disclosure] Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit
>
> The only point I see is, If you are going to do something you might as
> well do it correctly or not do it at all. If you get popular in the
> doing so, then so be it.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 14:06, muts wrote:
> > Re Johnh,
> >
> > If I'm not mistaken, the point isn't to get a *working exploit* out to the
> > public, but more of a proof of concept to point out a vulnerability.
> > The only reason to release a *fully* working exploit out to the wild would
> > be to get popular amongst the script kiddies. Well done, you're popular
> now
> > :)
> >
> > Muts
> >
> >  
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com
> > [mailto:full-disclosure-admin () lists netsys com] On Behalf Of JohnH
> > Sent: Tuesday, November 30, 2004 7:38 AM
> > To: full-disclosure () lists netsys com
> > Cc: bugtraq () securityfocus com
> > Subject: [Full-disclosure] Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit
> >
> > Here you go guys. A fully working Remote Mercury32 Imap exploit. This will
>
> > work on any windows OS. 100% universal.
> >
> > Only reason I am posting this is because im sick of seeing non working 
> > exploits released and WHITEHAT.CO.IL likes to do this.
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> >
> > Johnh () secnetops com
> > VIST: www.secnetops.com
>
> --- End Message ---