Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: And how long have buffer overflows been around?
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:43:31 -0500
On Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:33:27 EST, Glenn_Everhart () bankone com said:
There were rumors that the NT kernel was originally called Mica at DEC and that the code was in fact brought bodily to Microsoft, having been originally designed to be a VMS followon. If that is true you could say that the security design was in fact that of VMS V1, which dates
The only problem with that theory is that VMS *had* a security design, and there isn't one in NT. The only design overlap there is that Microsoft got some of the VMS design team to come on board for Win/NT. NT got stuck with having to be backward-combatable with Win 3.1, and you can fill in the blanks from there....
Attachment:
_bin
Description:
Current thread:
- RE: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Tarun Bhushan (Feb 26)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Glenn_Everhart (Feb 27)
- Re: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- Re: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Nick FitzGerald (Feb 27)
- Re: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 27)
- RE: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Vincent . Maes (Feb 27)
- RE: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Schmehl, Paul L (Feb 27)
- Re: And how long have buffer overflows been around? Nexus (Feb 27)
