Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Re: W2K source "leaked"?
From: Byron Copeland <nodialtone () comcast net>
Date: 12 Feb 2004 23:17:36 -0500
heh, figures. On Thu, 2004-02-12 at 22:22, gabriel rosenkoetter wrote:
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 06:26:39PM -0800, Nick Jacobsen wrote:http://smokeherb.com/windows/ Both NT4 and 2000. As a side note, there is actually very little content in these files... this is a very much "partial" leak...Just so no one coming in to work on Friday wastes those poor people's bandwidth more, the files aren't there any more.
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: W2K source "leaked"?, (continued)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Gadi Evron (Feb 13)
- RE: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Andre Ludwig (Feb 12)
- Partial protection against MyDoom Tomasz Grabowski (Feb 12)
- RE: Partial protection against MyDoom ragdelaed (Feb 12)
- RE: Partial protection against MyDoom ragdelaed (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? wolvie (Feb 12)
- Partial protection against MyDoom Tomasz Grabowski (Feb 12)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? tlarholm (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Nick Jacobsen (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? gabriel rosenkoetter (Feb 12)
- Re: Re: W2K source "leaked"? Byron Copeland (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? gabriel rosenkoetter (Feb 12)
- RE: W2K source "leaked"? Brad Griffin (Feb 12)
- Re: W2K source "leaked"? Lee (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? webheadport80 (Feb 12)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Georgi Guninski (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? cdowns (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Bernie, CTA (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Valdis . Kletnieks (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? ypwhich (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? madsaxon (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Georgi Guninski (Feb 13)
- Re: RE: W2K source "leaked"? Sebastian Dietz (Feb 13)
