Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-)
From: "Tiziano Radice" <tradice () eledis com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2004 11:40:44 +0100
Dear Sirs and Ladies,
I find full disclosure communications very useful and the people very professional,
but, forgive me, I find very difficult reading your interesting communications because there's no a good readability
(IMHO it seems a primordial chaos...)
I think in my very humble opinion that it would be better for everybody a message like this:
(Example)
=====================================================================================================
FROM: abc () def ghi
TO: jkl () mno pqr
SUBJECT: The sun is yellow and the sea is blue
REFERENCE: Answering the last email " The sand is white " posted from stu () vwx yz
dated December 25th, 2003
CONCLUSIONS AND GOALS: Suggestions for the best places for holidays.
TEXT: aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa
bbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
cccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc
dddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd
eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
LINKS ans BIBLIOGRAPHY: link1 () whereyouwant com; link2 () whereyouwant com; link3 () whereyouwant com
======================================================================================================
Excuse me but time is money and would be better reading all messages spending less time is possible.
HAPPY NEW 2004 !
...and long life to Full Disclosure :-)
dott. ing. Tiziano Radice
CAMAX DS srl
Via Copernico, 20
20060 Cassina de Pecchi (Milano - Italy)
Current thread:
- Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) Tiziano Radice (Jan 19)
- RE: Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) the measly one (Jan 19)
- Re: Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) Nico Golde (Jan 20)
- Re: Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) Nico Golde (Jan 20)
- Re: Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) Alain (Jan 23)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) sanch3z () ziplip com (Jan 23)
- RE: Readability of Full Disclosure communications :-) the measly one (Jan 19)
