Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits
From: Andre Ludwig <andre.ludwig () gmail com>
Date: Sat, 3 Jul 2004 20:06:58 -0700
Could it be because if it was a windows box it would have only have been 876 min uptime instead of days? ;) ha ha I just had to Andre Ludwig CISSP On Sat, 3 Jul 2004 22:55:20 +0200, Maarten <fulldisc () ultratux org> wrote:
On Saturday 03 July 2004 18:25, J.A. Terranson wrote:On Sat, 3 Jul 2004, RandallM wrote:After a number of years, much thought,and long nights I have developed a systematic method to prevent and thwart exploits on my system! NEVER REBOOT! I have been up and running for 876 days straight and have had no problems to date!Yeah, but what about Windowz boxes?Hum, how did you guess he isn't talking about a windows box ? 8-)) -- Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Successful in blocking all known exploits RandallM (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits Syke (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits J.A. Terranson (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits Maarten (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits Eric Paynter (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits Andre Ludwig (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits stephane nasdrovisky (Jul 06)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits Maarten (Jul 03)
- RE: Successful in blocking all known exploits Sean Crawford (Jul 03)
- Re: Successful in blocking all known exploits Merkur John Maclang (Jul 03)
