
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
RE: IE
From: Richard Silver <richard.silver () eamc org>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:52:44 -0500
On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 15:07, Leif Sawyer wrote:
On Mon, July 19, 2004, Eric Paynter replied to:nicolas vigier, whom said:
Not to mention all the vendors out there whose products have assinine restrictions, because they can't be bothered to code portable web-apps. Think Cisco, for one. I personally think that _EVERYBODY_ with a CCO contract should open up a TAC case complaining that X-application (website, RME, VMS, etc..) doesn't work with a W3C-Standards Compliant browser, nor with latest-bug-fixed JREs. I've already got mine open, but of course "Use I.E. or some old version of Netscape Navigator, and an old JRE!" is the typical response. They need a lot more prodding to keep their security platform up-to-date with security standards.
I have been griping to my Cisco sales team for years (being an Ex-Cisco SE myself) about the dismal support for any browser but IE. I could dump IE entirely were it not for my Call Manager. At least it seems that some of the products that they acquired that were initially cross-platform usually remain fairly browser-agnostic. -- ------------------------------ Richard Silver Sr Network Engineer East Alabama Medical Center www.eamc.org ------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: IE, (continued)
- RE: IE Richard Silver (Jul 19)
- Re: IE Stef (Jul 19)
- Re: IE :VSMail mx1 Ted Morin (Jul 20)