
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel
From: Nomen Nescio <nobody () dizum com>
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2004 08:00:05 +0200 (CEST)
At 04:17 PM 7/20/2004 -0700, not-mi2g () hushmail com wrote: (quoting mi2g):
"These developments mean that any person or corporation can quite easily decide to launch a clandestine smear campaign against any brand in the world by bombarding appropriate bulletin boards and trusted forums with false information through free email accounts," said DK Matai, Executive Chairman, mi2g.
Why would anyone _need_ to launch a smear campaign against mi2g? They do such an excellent job proving how they are founded entirely upon hyperbole and fear-mongering. Were it not for reporters desperate for something, anything, to write a story about we would never hear about mi2g. To be fair, it is not all mi2g's fault, incompetent reporters who listen to Matai and vomit back up his nonsense are as much as fault.
If it was blatantly evident that the post was a hoax, why is mi2g crying like a six year old with a skinned knee?
Nice imagery. _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- mi2g - fud, lies and libel not-mi2g (Jul 20)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Eric Paynter (Jul 20)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Mary Landesman (Jul 20)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel gadgeteer (Jul 21)
- Re: Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Brian Toovey (Jul 21)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel gadgeteer (Jul 21)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Thor (Jul 22)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- RE: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Thor Larholm (Jul 20)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel gadgeteer (Jul 21)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Nomen Nescio (Jul 21)
- RE: mi2g - fud, lies and libel vesselen.mironov (Jul 21)
- Re: RE: mi2g - fud, lies and libel a (Jul 22)
- Re: Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel http-equiv () excite com (Jul 21)
- Re: mi2g - fud, lies and libel Siegfried (Jul 21)