Re: PIX vs CheckPoint

[Cyril Guibourg <plonk-o-matic () teaser fr>]

"Otero, Hernan         (EDS)" <HOtero () lanchile cl> writes:

> I think you do, because at least a nat 0 it´s needed to get traffic passing
> through the pix.

This is odd, I do have a running config under 6.2 without any nat statement.

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html