Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm)

From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
Date: Mon, 29 Mar 2004 19:52:42 -0500

On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 11:44:12 PST, Drew Copley <dcopley () eeye com>  said:

Yeah. It is a zero day worm, and it is very notable as such.  

I can not recall a previous zero day worm. (AV is not my job, but I do
try and follow zero day.)

Hence, IE has birthed us the first zero day worm.


Has anybody offered the Microsoft dude who denied the existence of 0-days
some ketchup for his fried crow? ;)

Attachment: _bin
Description:

Current thread:

Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues, (continued)
- - - Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geoincidents (Mar 29)
  - Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Clayton Kossmeyer (Mar 29)
    - Re: Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Luke Norman (Mar 29)
    - Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Geoincidents (Mar 29)
  - RE: Addressing Cisco Security Issues Lou Zirko (Mar 29)
  - Re: Addressing Cisco Security Issues neal rauhauser (Mar 29)
- AW: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Ron Stiemer (Mar 29)
- Message not available
  - Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Nick FitzGerald (Mar 30)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Drew Copley (Mar 29)
  - Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Berend-Jan Wever (Mar 29)
  - Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 29)
    - RE: [inbox] Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Exibar (Mar 29)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Thor Larholm (Mar 29)
  - Re: RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Tim (Mar 29)
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Jelmer (Mar 30)
- Re: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) - - (Mar 30)
- RE: new internet explorer exploit (was new worm) Drew Copley (Mar 30)