Full Disclosure mailing list archives

Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea?

From: Joe Stewart <jstewart () lurhq com>
Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 10:05:35 -0500

On Monday 08 March 2004 9:06 am, Harlan Carvey wrote:

Oddly enough, this *has* been discussed...at length.
That doesn't mean that it's not worth discussing
more...


Here's one of the better papers I have seen on the ethics of the 
counter-hack. And I'm not just saying that because a friend wrote it :)

http://www.lurhq.com/ethics.html


-Joe

-- 
Joe Stewart, GCIH 
Senior Security Researcher
LURHQ http://www.lurhq.com/

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

Current thread:

Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? technocrat (Mar 08)
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? Harlan Carvey (Mar 08)
  - Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? Joe Stewart (Mar 08)
  - RE: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? Mike Fratto (Mar 08)
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? the lumpalaya (Mar 08)
  - Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? the lumpalaya (Mar 08)
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? Martijn Lievaart (Mar 08)
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? (wtf) phased (Mar 08)
  - Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? (wtf) Cael Abal (Mar 08)
    - Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? (wtf) Valdis . Kletnieks (Mar 08)
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? Gregory A. Gilliss (Mar 08)
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? Exibar (Mar 08)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Counter-Attacking hackers? Is this really a good idea? DAN MORRILL (Mar 08)

(Thread continues...)