
Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Cisco's stolen code
From: Maarten <fulldisc () ultratux org>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 01:25:08 +0200
On Tuesday 25 May 2004 21:41, Ron DuFresne wrote:
On Tue, 25 May 2004, Ng, Kenneth (US) wrote:
[...]
suspect. Is it unfair? Definitely. But this is why the GNU people emphasize staying away from any licensed source code.Well except all that code stoen from SCO <grin>...
SCO ? What's that, is that short for ciSCO...? ;-)) Maarten -- Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ng, Kenneth (US) (May 25)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Maarten (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Shachar Shemesh (May 26)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Azerail (May 27)
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Cisco's stolen code Eric Scher (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
- Re: Cisco's stolen code x30n (May 25)
- RE: Re: Cisco's stolen code Aditya, ALD [Aditya Lalit Deshmukh] (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Adam Szilveszter (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code Tobias Weisserth (May 26)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code tcleary2 (May 25)
- Re: Re: Cisco's stolen code James Edwards (May 25)
(Thread continues...)
- RE: Cisco's stolen code Ron DuFresne (May 25)