RE: Re: Cisco's stolen code

["Brown, James (Jim)" <JBrown () thrupoint net>]

-----Original Message-----
From: Valdis.Kletnieks () vt edu
To: Benjamin Krueger
Cc: Mister Coffee; Tobias Weisserth; full-disclosure () lists netsys com
Sent: 5/27/04 10:27 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-disclosure] Re: Cisco's stolen code 

On Wed, 26 May 2004 14:36:13 PDT, Benjamin Krueger said:

> A confidential, copyrighted, and incriminating document is leaked out
of a major institution
> and in to the hands of a journalism organization. The document is
intensely scrutinized by
> that organization and a few experts they bring in. They break the
story to the public along
> with the document.
>
> Is anyone liable for copyright violation? If so, who? Is there any
case law establishing a
> precedent for prosecuting the leaker and/or the journalists who broke
the story?

Google for "+scientology +copyright".


Change your requirement from 'confidential' to 'Top Secret' then
google for "pentagon papers".







Note:  The information contained in this message may be privileged and
confidential and protected from disclosure.  If the reader of this message
is not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent responsible for
delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is
strictly prohibited.  If you have received this communication in error,
please notify us immediately by replying to the message and deleting it from
your computer. Thank you.  ThruPoint, Inc.