Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Fw: Sasser author
From: Nick FitzGerald <nick () virus-l demon co uk>
Date: Sat, 15 May 2004 14:36:22 +1200
William Warren to Paolo Mattiangeli's grizzle about being Sasser'ed at home:
any firewall even the one inside xp would have stopped sasser and you would have been able to patch at your leisure.
And, depending on your network architecture, it can be even easier than that. Why would any vaguely competent system admin even have the services that Sasser depends on bound to their Inernet-facing network interface in the first place?? Yeah -- I know, ethernet to DSL/cable/satellite/etc which doubles as the "house LAN" interface. So far all the SOHO users I've helped clean up Sasser have been on dial-up so why does MS still insist on binding MS client (and F&P ??) to dial-up interfaces by default? -- Nick FitzGerald Computer Virus Consulting Ltd. Ph/FAX: +64 3 3529854 _______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Sasser author, (continued)
- Re: Sasser author Mister Coffee (May 14)
- RE: Sasser author Harlan Carvey (May 13)
- Re: Sasser author Rodrigo Barbosa (May 13)
- Re: Sasser author Harlan Carvey (May 13)
- RE: Sasser author Bart . Lansing (May 13)
- Re: Sasser author Rodrigo Barbosa (May 13)
- RE: Sasser Author brownr9 (May 13)
- Re: RE: Sasser Author Oliver Kellermann (May 13)
- Fw: Sasser author Paolo Mattiangeli (May 14)
- Re: Fw: Sasser author William Warren (May 14)
- RE: [inbox] Re: Fw: Sasser author Exibar (May 14)
- Re: Fw: Sasser author Nick FitzGerald (May 14)
- Re: Fw: Sasser author William Warren (May 14)
