Full Disclosure mailing list archives
Re: Why is IRC still around?
From: Harry Hoffman <hhoffman () ip-solutions net>
Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 19:37:30 -0500
The fact that it is an open protocol makes it easy to spot, you don't look for specific ports you look for specific behavior (i.e. -> privmsg)
Not that I'm saying this should be done. IRC is used by many ppl in very good ways!
I'm just saying that the two points shouldn't be confused. SSL is a bit of a different story.
--Harry Bowes, Ronald (EST) wrote: [snip]
So do you intend to scan every computer on the Internet on port 6667, and shut down every server found running, the move on to random ports that zombies probably use, and start attacking sites that provide open source clients that use an open protocol?
_______________________________________________ Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Current thread:
- Re: Why is IRC still around?, (continued)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Steve R (Nov 20)
- RE: Re: Why is IRC still around? Poof (Nov 21)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Steve R (Nov 22)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Steve R (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Janusz A. Urbanowicz (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? hutuworm (Nov 21)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? nicolas vigier (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 23)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? nicolas vigier (Nov 24)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 23)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Bowes, Ronald (EST) (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 19)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Harry Hoffman (Nov 20)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Bowes, Ronald (EST) (Nov 19)
- RE: Why is IRC still around? Keith Pachulski (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Danny (Nov 20)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? Darren Reed (Nov 21)
- Re: Why is IRC still around? ntx0f (Nov 20)
